Legal Opinion

John Goodwin, Jr., Lois Goodwin, the Mead Corporation v. George Fischer Foundry Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 26, 1985No. 84-7241PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

I. FACTS

In this diversity case, appellant, George Fischer Foundry Systems, Inc. (GFFS), appeals from a ruling by the district court dismissing its counterclaim seeking contractual indemnity. GFFS sought indemnity for its loss or liability to John Goodwin, Jr. from his employer, The Mead Corporation (Mead). Goodwin suffered severe burns arising out of the use of a Fischer converter furnace, sold by GFFS to Mead. Mead intervened in this case, and aligned itself with Goodwin, to recover workmen’s compensation benefits paid by Mead to Goodwin, its injured employee.

GFFS claims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Intercontinental Hotels Corp. v. GoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ferren v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Thyssenkrupp Steel USA, LLC v. United Forming, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
  4. In re Welding Fume Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  5. Edward E. Bryan v. Hall Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API