Legal Opinion

Trojan Mining Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Baltimore

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1885No. 9881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Action on a fire insurance policy. The policy contained the following clause: —

“It is agreed and understood that during such times as the above works are idle a watchman shall be employed by the assured, to be in and upon the premises day and night.”

The allegation in the complaint on that subject is as follows : “That at the time of such fire, and for some time prior thereto, *28the ‘works of said corporation, so assured, as aforesaid, were idle, but during all said time a watchman was employed by plaintiff in and upon the premises day and .night, and said watchman was upop said…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rankin v. Amazon Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McGannon v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Siera Milling, Smelting, and Mining Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Houston Oil & Transport Co. v. Ætna Ins.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API