Siera Milling, Smelting, and Mining Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the "city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This is an action to recover a loss upon a fire insurance policy. Judgment was given for the plaintiff, and from that and an order denying a new trial defendant appeals. It is contended by the appellant that the jury found contrary to the instructions of the court, and that the evidence before them "went, without contradiction, to show that the plaintiff had violated at least two of the warranties by which it was bound by the terms of the policy, and that the verdict was, therefore, *236against the evidence. The obligations thus imposed are to this effect: That during all the time the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Wenzel v. Commercial Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Trojan Mining Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- McKenzie v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sweaney & Smith Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- McEvoy v. Security Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- McGannon v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.