Legal Opinion

Northern Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Cowell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1933No. 24310. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal is from a decree in favor of Shields, as trustee for certificate holders, and intervener in the action, foreclosing a mortgage on property called the Cowell building in Seattle, denying any participation in the foreclosure. Although the action is one in equity and tried as such, the trial court, probably for convenience of the parties, made extensive findings of fact. The appeal is from the entire decree.

The claims of error are that the court erred in refusing to hold that appellant’s right to the note and mortgage was superior to the interest of participating certificate holders,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. Northern Bond & Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Magee v. RisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Spokane Savings & Loan Society v. Park Vista Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hampson v. WeltWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Columbia Pacific Mortgage, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1981
  2. Beckmann v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Zoff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nichols v. DebritzWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API