Legal Opinion

Schneider v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1951No. 12501_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, Schneider, was indicted in the court below for an offer and for the payment of money to an officer of the United States in violation of Section 201, Title 18 United States Code. He was tried, was found guilty and has appealed. Taking those inferences from the evidence most favorable to the prosecution, as we must, the following appears.

Schneider was the successful bidder for the purchase of scrap wool and cotton materials, property of the United States and located at an Army air base in Montana. On November 22, 1948, pursuant to telephone conversations…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Boykin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  4. United States v. Crescent-Kelvan Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. United States v. BickfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arroyo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. State v. CorMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. CarylMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. United States v. SchneiderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. United States v. LaurelliDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API