Legal Opinion
United States v. Crescent-Kelvan Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 26, 1948No. 9350PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The information in the case at bar charges Crescent-Kelvan Company and the individual defendants in two separate counts with violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of June 25, 1938, c. 675, Section 1 et seq., 52 Stat. 1040 (1938), 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq.
The first count charges that the defendants caused to be shipped in interstate commerce a drug, known by the trade name of “Methosol”, adulterated within the purview of Section 501(a) (4) of the Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 351(a) (4) in that it contained, for purpose of coloring only, a coal-tar color, “Butter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Seven Cases of Eckman's Alternative v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- United States v. GollinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Charles Edward Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Benny ShaffnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Lindsay B. Shafer, Lewis Shafer, Joseph Shafer, and Lewis Shafer, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.