Legal Opinion
Riddle v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 6, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-CV-2028PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
The defendant, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, has filed a motion to dismiss the instant personal injury action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons outlined in the following paragraphs, the motion is denied.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
On April 16, 1993, Plaintiff filed his civil action complaint in this case pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq., alleging that he was, at all relevant times, employed as a maintenance manager by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) working…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Riddle v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- United States v. Plasser American Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999