Legal Opinion
Riddle v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 7, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-2166 PLFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
On May 29, 1992, Barry Riddle filed a civil action against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (“Riddle I ”). He alleged that defendant failed to use ordinary care to famish plaintiff with a safe work environment; subjected him to unsafe and inadequate working conditions and a hostile work environment; and conducted an intentional campaign of investigations and harassment. He sought relief pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- John Hubicki v. Acf Industries, Incorporated, John Hubicki v. United Steelworkers of America and Acf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Rosetti v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Brannock Associates, Inc. v. Capitol 801 Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Sherwin v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Stanton, John v. DC Ct AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997