Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Swartzel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1950No. 2064PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WISEMAN, J:

Submitted on motion of defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal on six separate grounds. This is a criminal proceeding which originated in the Municipal Court of Dayton, where the defendant was found guilty of violating a health ordinance. An appeal was taken to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio, which reversed the judgment of the trial court. From that judgment an appeal was taken to this Court by the City of Dayton.

The first ground of the motion is that the notice of appeal is defective in that it does not state to what court the appeal is taken. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Columbus v. BalzanOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Fifty West Broad, Inc. v. PoulsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Manhattan Tereazzo Brass Strip Co. v. Benzing & SonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Devonian Gas & Oil Co. v. BiehlOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Northwestern National Insurance v. BillingsOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Northwestern National Insurance v. BillingsOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API