Legal Opinion

People v. Woppner

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Fourth District.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder. The main error relied on by him to reverse the judgment is, that the Court, without the consent of the defendant, gave to the jury an oral charge after they had returned into Court for further information in respect to the law.

This charge is not found in any bill of exceptions or statements of the Judge below, but it is agreed by stipulation, that the charge was so given, reserving, however, the point whether, as no statement or bill of exceptions was presented to the Judge within ten days, this Court can notice the point.

We think that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phelan v. OlneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Che Gong v. StearnsOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. TrimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Darling-Singer Lumber Co. v. Oriental Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API