Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. Roadway Express, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided January 16, 2003No. I.C. NOS. 012986, 962511Published

1Dissent

I agree with the majority finding that plaintiff has sustained a compensable occupational disease, bladder cancer, in the course and scope of his employment. I disagree, however, with the majority's finding as to the liable employer/carrier.

First, I agree with the majority that the results of the IARC study, EPA study, and other studies which identify diesel exhaust to be a carcinogen capable of producing bladder cancer are sufficiently scientifically reliable to be admissible in evidence and form the basis for expert testimony that plaintiff's exposure to diesel exhaust in his employment was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Dean v. Carolina Coach Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Ballenger v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Cummings v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API