Pearson v. PEERLESS FLOORING COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The judgment as to Moore and its carrier is final. Plaintiff did not appeal. Cf. Willingham v. Rock & Sand Co., 240 N.C. 281, 82 S.E. 2d 68. Moreover, plaintiff, in his brief, says: “There is no evidence which could possibly support the conclusion that Pearson was an employee of Moore.”
This appeal relates solely to plaintiff’s claim as against Peerless and its carrier. If Pearson was the employee of Peerless, as plaintiff contends, the death was compensable. If Pearson was not the employee of Peerless, but an independent contractor, as appellants contend, the Industrial Commission had no…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Aycock v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Cooper v. Asheville Citizen-Times Publishing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Little v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Pressley v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.