Legal Opinion
The Jim & Bill
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 24, 1933No. 13485PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This suit is brought to recover for damages alleged to have been caused to a moored boat by swells from the steamer Alexander Hamilton.
I find the facts as follows:
At all the times hereinafter mentioned and at the time of the trial, the libelant was the owner of the lighter Jim and Bill, which was up until the time of the happening hereinafter referred to tight, hut moored in an unsatisfactory manner.
The steamer Alexander Hamilton was, during the currency of process herein, within this district and the jurisdiction of this court.
On September 3, 1932, at about 8:45…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- The Hendrick HudsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869
- Ruddiman v. Scow PlatformU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
- Baker v. The Big JimDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1894
- Muellerweisse v. Pile Driver E. O. A.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paducah Towing Company, Inc. v. Paducah Towing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Paducah Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Martin Marine Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Williamson v. the Tug CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1958