Ruddiman v. Scow Platform
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Admiralty. Action for wharfage.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The libelant sues for wharfage of a scow platform along-side his dock walk, at One Hundred and Thirty-Eighth street, Harlem river, from November, 1886, to November, 1887. No lien under the state law can be claimed, as no specification of claim has been filed, and more than a year has elapsed. To admit of a maritime lien, the scow structure must be a “vessel,” within the meaning of the maritime law. I am of opinion that the structure in question, though afloat, is not such a vessel, because it was not designed or used for the purpose of navigation, nor engaged in the uses of commerce, nor in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- The Hendrick HudsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869
- The Hezekiah BaldwinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1876
- Jones v. Coal BargesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1855
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lozman v. City of Riviera BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Evansville & Bowling Green Packet Co. v. Chero Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Charles Barnes Co. v. One Dredge BoatDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1909
- Berton v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Dock Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Koernschild v. W.H. Streit, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.