Legal Opinion
Martin Marine Transp. Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 12, 1946No. 131PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
This is a suit in admiralty to recover damages to the tug Eureka which resulted from the parting of the mooring lines of the barge Darien which in turn is alleged to have been caused by the excessive swells of a Coast Guard picket boat in the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal.
Primarily for disposition is the correctness of a ruling that the respondent was not precluded from offering evidence after its motion at the close of libellant’s case had been overruled. The court in The Persiana, D.C.N.Y., 158 F. 912, held: “It has been the uniform practice of this court not to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bull v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- The PersianaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907
- The RotherfieldDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1903
- The FavoritaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
- La SavoieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paducah Towing Company, Inc. v. Paducah Towing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Paducah Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- O'Donnell Transportation Co. v. M/V MARYLAND TRADERDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Ohio River Company v. Continental Grain CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Williamson v. the Tug CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.