Legal Opinion
Townsend v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Military Department
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 12, 1991No. CIV-90-383-PPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANT LEAVE TO CORRECT ERROR IN CAPTION
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
In this Title VII action, the plaintiff, Maxine Gonzales Townsend (“Townsend”), claims that the Oklahoma Military Department (“OMD”) rejected her application for a job as a shop foreman because she is a woman. In a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b), the State of Oklahoma (“the state”) has urged the Court to dismiss the action: (1) because Townsend has failed to satisfy a statutory condition precedent to suing a governmental entity; (2) because Townsend has not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Evelyn Hancock v. City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- John A. Mitchell v. Bruce King, Governor of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Greenwood v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sifre v. Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Hiller v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Used Motor Vehicle & Parts CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Forehand v. Florida State Hospital at ChattahoocheeDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1993
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014