Wilkowski v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
This is a workmen’s compensation case. Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referréd to as claimant, and defendants in error as the commission, the fund and the board respectively. The facts are not in dispute.
Claimant sought compensation for an injury due to an accident arising out of and in the course of his alleged employment by the board. The commission, the fund and the board denied that he was such employee under the terms of the act. The commission held that he was not such employee, “but that he is an independent contractor,” and denied compensation. He thereupon resorted to the district…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- McBurney v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Scordis's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Skinner v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Claim of Orr v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1984