Legal Opinion

Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2000No. 99-1424PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The petition for rehearing by the panel is denied. Judge Lay dissents.

2DissentLay, Circuit Judge

The persuasive petition for rehearing filed by Marvin Lumber requires this court to grant a rehearing. It is mystifying to me that the majority opinion adheres to the opinion in Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Chief Industries, 106 F.3d 1409 (8th Cir.1997), rather than following state law as set forth by the Minnesota Court of Appeals in Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. Safe-Glo Products, 582 N.W.2d 576 (Minn.Ct.App.1998), which rejects the reasoning set forth by the majori*978ty in Chief Industries. The law of Minnesota…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. Safe-Glo Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Third Party v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Third Party Minnesota, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API