Legal Opinion

Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. Safe-Glo Products Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1998No. C5-97-2321PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant moved unsuccessfully for summary judgment on the ground that respondent was precluded from recovering in tort by the economic loss doctrine set out in Minn.Stat. § 604.10(a). A jury then determined that appellant was liable for fire damage to respondent’s property. Appellant challenges the denial of summary judgment, the sufficiency of the evidence on causation, certain of the trial court’s evidentiary decisions, and the denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial. We conclude that respondent is not a merchant of heaters within the meaning of Minn.Stat. §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Lloyd F. Smith Co. v. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Holden Farms, Inc. v. Hog Slat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Third Party v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Third Party Minnesota, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Holden Farms, Inc. v. Hog Slat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API