State v. Salge
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, State of Nevada, Douglas County, lion. Daotel Virginpresiding. The facts in this case appear sufficiently in the opinion of the Court. Errors in law occurring at the trial in criminal cases can only be brought to the Supreme Court for review by bill of exceptions signed by the Judge. The only variation from this rule is in the matter of the Judge’s charge.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, State of Nevada, Douglas County, lion. Daotel Virginpresiding. The facts in this case appear sufficiently in the opinion of the Court. Errors in law occurring at the trial in criminal cases can only be brought to the Supreme Court for review by bill of exceptions signed by the Judge. The only variation from this rule is in the matter of the Judge’s charge. (Laws of 1861, p. 480, sec. 421.) Even if the statement sent up to this Court might be considered by the Court, no error is shown at the trial, for no disqualification of any…
1Concurrence
Opinion by
Lewis, C. J., Beatty, J.,
concurring.
The challenge to the juror Smart was properly disallowed by the Court. That he had not paid his poll tax or had his name registered at the time of the trial of this cause can be no objection to him as a juror.
The Constitution of the State, Section 1, Article II., provides that every white male citizen of the United States (not laboring under certain disabilities) of the age of twenty-one years and upwards, who shall have actually and not constructively resided in the State six months, and in the district or county thirty days, next preceding any'…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. WoppnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PlunkettNevada Supreme Court · 1943
- Che Gong v. StearnsOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Darling-Singer Lumber Co. v. Oriental Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928