Legal Opinion

Hosiden Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 12, 1994No. Court No. 91-10-00720. Slip Op. 94-128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GOLDBERG, Judge:

This matter is before the court on a motion for a Writ of Mandamus to Enforce Judgment filed by Sharp Corporation (“Sharp”), one of the plaintiffs in this consolidated action. Sharp seeks a court order directing Susan G. Esserman, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), to take all actions necessary to implement the final Judgment Order issued by this court in conjunction with its memorandum opinion dated April 14,1994. Hosiden Corp. v. United States, 18 CIT -, 852 F.Supp. 1050 (1994).

BACKGROUND

In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. The Timken Company v. The United States, and China National MacHinery and Equipment Import and Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. Hosiden Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  5. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  2. Hosiden Corp. v. Advanced Display Manufacturers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Hosiden Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Corporation, Apple Computer, Inc., International Business MacHines Corporation, Compaq Computer Corporation, Tandy Corporation, and Sharp Corporation v. Advanced Display Manufacturers of America, and Planar Systems, Inc., Plasmaco, Inc., Ois Optical Imaging Systems, Inc., Cherry Display Products Corporation, Electro-Plasma, Inc., Photonics Technology, Inc., and Magnascreen Corporation, and Texas Instruments, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API