Legal Opinion

Holbert v. Echeverria

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1987No. 61422, 61212Published

1Opinion of the Court

744 P.2d 960 (1987)

Pansy M. HOLBERT and David Dumas, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Counter-Appellees,

v.

Nelson ECHEVERRIA d/b/a Nelson Construction Company, Defendant-Appellee and Counter-Appellants.

Nos. 61422, 61212.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 20, 1987.

Charles W. Brown, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs-appellants and counter-appellees.

Reginald D. Gaston, Gaston & Meadows, Norman, for defendant-appellee and counter-appellants.

OPALA, Justice.

The two issues presented for decision are: [1] Does an aggrieved individual have an implied private right of action to recover for a violation of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API