Miller v. City of Charlotte
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Plaintiff contends (1) that her attorney’s letter to the City Manager dated 30 July 1970 (within ninety days of the date of the accident) substantially complied with the requirements of Section 9.01 of the Charter of the defendant city and (2) that the defendant city in part because of its letter dated 3 August 1970 acknowledging receipt of Exhibit A is estopped to complain of a lack of notice in this matter.
Similar contentions in remarkably similar factual situations were made and rejected in Redmond v. City of Asheville, 23 N.C. App. 739, 209 S.E. 2d 820 (1974) ; Johnson v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Short v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Redmond v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Johnson v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972