Legal Opinion

McDuff v. Kurn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1937No. 6 Div. 34PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action at law for damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, McDuff. It was tried on counts A, B, and C.

Count A is predicated upon the negligent failure to employ a competent fellow servant, Mulligan, or a negligent retention of him in the employment of the defendant carrier with knowledge of his incompetency on account of his habitual drunkenness, and because of his dangerous character when drunk, and that while so drunk, and in the line and scope of his employment, he wrongfully shot and killed McDuff.

The common law prescribed such a duty upon the employer,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Wabash Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. First National Bank v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  5. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bonham v. Regions Mortgage, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  2. City of Birmingham v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Barrett v. Consolidated Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API