Legal Opinion

Foster v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 4, 1924No. 23922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment rejecting their demand for damages and for the removal of a swimming pool in front of their property. The property belongs to Mrs. Julia Foster, but stands recorded in the name of the co-plaintiff, Aniceto Ruiz, as security for a debt.

The defenses pleaded by the city were.(1) an estoppel; (2) the prescription of one year; and (3) a denial that the swimming pool in front of plaintiffs’ property had caused them any loss or damage. The district court sustained the plea of estoppel. The two other defensés are reurged by the city in answer to the appeal.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Louisiana Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Harrison v. Louisiana Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. Hunter v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Caldwell Bros. Real Estate, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Brockett v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API