Legal Opinion
Hunter v. City of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 13, 1943No. 1 Div. 192PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs are the owners of business property abutting on Government Street in the City of Mobile, which they claim was diminished in market value by the construction of the ramp or approach to what is known as the Bankhead Tunnel. The averments of the complaint are substantially identical with those held to state a cause of action in McGowin v. City of Mobile, 241 Ala. 576, 4 So.2d 161, and a detailed statement of the manner in which the property is alleged to have been damaged may well be here omitted. The complaint is properly interpreted as stating a cause of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Jones v. New Orleans & Selma RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- United States v. Whited & Wheless, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Cooper v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- MacLeod v. City of Takoma ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Public Service Commission v. Highfield Water Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Brock v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Alexander City v. Continental Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Mahan v. HolifieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.