Phoenix Insurance v. Churchwell
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether the motor vehicle exclusion clause in a homeowner’s policy precluded coverage for bodily injury claims incurred in an automobile accident. A Superior Court judge, on cross motions for summary judgment, ruled that it did. This appeal by the claimants followed.
*613We summarize the uncontested facts and procedural history of the case. Amy Kirk (Kirk) was the owner and operator of a motor vehicle that slammed head on into a tree. In the car with Kirk were her daughter, Lauren Kirk, age two, and Cosette Churchwell, age three. Both children were in the rear…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Offices Unlimited, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Rischitelli v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Premier Insurance v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. SampsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Zang v. NRT New England Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Superior Court CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
- First Specialty Insurance v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Society for Christian Activities, Inc. v. Markel InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.