Legal Opinion

Phoenix Insurance v. Churchwell

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 24, 2003No. 01-P-1023PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the motor vehicle exclusion clause in a homeowner’s policy precluded coverage for bodily injury claims incurred in an automobile accident. A Superior Court judge, on cross motions for summary judgment, ruled that it did. This appeal by the claimants followed.

*613We summarize the uncontested facts and procedural history of the case. Amy Kirk (Kirk) was the owner and operator of a motor vehicle that slammed head on into a tree. In the car with Kirk were her daughter, Lauren Kirk, age two, and Cosette Churchwell, age three. Both children were in the rear…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Offices Unlimited, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Rischitelli v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Premier Insurance v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. SampsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Zang v. NRT New England Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Superior Court CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. First Specialty Insurance v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  5. Society for Christian Activities, Inc. v. Markel InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API