State v. Holmes
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.
Appellant Timothy J. Holmes was convicted of receiving stolen property in violation of SDCL 22-30A-7. He appeals, alleging that the trial court erred in refusing his proposed jury instruction on presumption of innocence. We affirm.
At trial, appellant cross-examined . the State’s witnesses but did not testify or present evidence on his behalf. In settling the jury instructions, the trial court refused appellant’s request to include South Dakota Pattern Jury Instruction 1-4 on presumption of innocence. It reads:
It is a fundamental principle of our law that a person…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kentucky v. WhortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cane v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- City of Sioux Falls v. WolfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Slaughter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HolmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. AuenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AuenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. EllSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.