City of Sioux Falls v. Wolf
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Defendant is here complaining'1 of the judgment and sentence on a jury verdict in the municipal court of the City of Sioux Falls for driving a motor vehicle while under the' influence of intoxicating liquor.
The only errors assigned on this appeal relate to’ the giving and refusal of instructions. No question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is presented.
Defendant first urges that the court committed prejudicial error in refusing the following instruction:
“You are instructed that the defendant is presumed to be innocent and that this presumption attends him…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bathke v. MyklebustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. LibermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- People in Interest of SRSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Eric Arthur Walton, United States of America v. Eldridge Mayfield, A/K/A SippyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- State v. HolmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HolmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HolmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.