Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Auen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1984No. 14191Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

I dissent.

The State Legislature has the power to set maximum sentences for crime. The trial courts of this state must use discretion to impose sentences within máximums and mínimums allowed by the legislature. By changing the maximum sentence as set by the legislature, the law-trained magistrate attempted to skirt the constitutional right of a trial by jury. The legislature prescribed a maximum sentence for this offense which included incarceration. A trial court judge affirmed the law-trained magistrate’s decision. Constitutionally, and by enactments of the State Legislature, they were both…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. OppermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. Iron ShellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API