Legal Opinion
Jones v. Frank
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 20, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-B-1598PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment on plaintiff Julius Jones’ (Jones) age discrimination (29 U.S.C. § 633a) and Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16) claims. The motion has been briefed fully and oral argument is unnecessary. The facts material to the resolution of the motion are undisputed and it may be determined as a matter of law. I will grant summary judgment and dismiss this action with prejudice.
Jones, an African-American male over the age of 40, alleges the United States Postal Service denied him the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stevens v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Julius J. Jones, Jr. v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Kun v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & DunnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Anderson v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Curtis v. ClassDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1996
- Anderson v. Unisys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995