Legal Opinion

Krites v. Plott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1943PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

We agree with the construction placed upon the deed by the trial judge.

In the construction of deeds, the Court has endeavored to follow and apply the principles adopted and promulgated in Triplett v. Williams, 149 N. C., 394, 63 S. E., 19, rather comprehensively expressed in the rule that such an instrument must be construed from “its four corners” .in order that its true intent may be given effect. Seawell v. Hall, 185 N. C., 80, 82, 116 S. E., 189. Triplett v. Williams, supra, cites with . approval 1 Jones, Real Property, section 568 : “The inclination of many courts at the present day is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Jones v. . WhichardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Doren v. GillumIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fountain County Coal & Mining Co. v. BeckleheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Reed v. ElmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Jamerson v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API