Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Solomon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1939No. 27553PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The vital question for determination is whether Lucy Haines Gibson is precluded from litigating the issue of negligence in the present case by reason of the adjudication on that matter in the former action.

In discussing the subject of res judicata, the Supreme Court of • South Dakota said, in the case of Keith v. Wiliers Truck Service, 64 S. D., 274, 276, 266 N. W., 256, 257:

“The general principles, applied in numerous decisions, may be stated as follows: First, a final judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction upon the merits is a bar to any future action between the same…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Douglas v. Daniels Bros. Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. May Coal Co. v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Wright v. SchickOhio Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Karr, Admr. v. SixtOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Smith v. PreisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API