Legal Opinion
Karr, Admr. v. Sixt
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1946No. 30522PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Section 10509-166, General Code, recites:
“When the death of a person is caused by wrongful act, neglect or default such as would have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, if death had not ensued, the corporation which, or the person who would have been liable if death had not ensued, or the administrator or executor of the estate of such person, as such admin istrator or executor, shall be liable to an action for damages, notwithstanding the death of the person injured * * V’
As is true in a majority of the jurisdictions of this country…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibson v. SolomonOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
3Cited by61 opinions
- Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Gallimore v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Snyder v. StanfordOhio Supreme Court · 1968
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.