Legal Opinion
Neo-Tech Systems, Inc. v. Provident Bank
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided October 17, 1974No. A-736574PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNtjkre, J.
This case comes before the court pursuant to Civ. R. 56, on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by The Provident Bank, defendant third party plaintiff, and on a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by Neo-Tech Systems, Inc., plaintiff. The court has reviewed the file herein including the pleadings, affidavit, extensive memoranda of counsel and oral arguments.
The facts are basically not in dispute. The aeoeptance of what is pertinent fact regarding the motions herein is in dispute. This is an action against The Provident Bank by one of its customers, Neo-Tech Systems, Inc. On or about…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hardex-Steubenville Corp. v. Western Pennsylvania National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Exchange Bank & Trust Co. v. Kidwell Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Pollin v. Mindy Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Gennone v. Peoples National Bank & Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1971
- J. H. Hinz Co. v. FreemanCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1939
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Monreal v. Fleet BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ed Stinn Chevrolet, Inc. v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Space Distributors, Inc. v. FLAGSHIP BANK, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Associated Home & RV Sales, Inc. v. Bank of BelenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.