Legal Opinion
J. H. Hinz Co. v. Freeman
City of Cleveland Municipal Court
Decided April 3, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By DRUCKER, J.
On April 21, 1937, the defendant herein gave to the plaintiff a certain check, which was executed as follows:
“The Cleveland Trust Company No. 992
Cleveland, Ohio,
April 21, 1937
Pay to the Order of J. H. Hinz Co. $27.31
Twenty-seven and 31/100...........Dollars
The Woodhill chemical Co. (signed) Norman J. Freeman”
The check was duly presented for payment on April 22, 1937, but was returned to plaintiff for the reason that there was not sufficient funds.
The Woodhill Chemical Company, the recipient of the consideration for which the check was issued, was incorporated in Ohio in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coal River Collieries v. Eureka Coal & Wood Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GrossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Germania National Bank of Milwaukee v. MarinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Toon v. McCawWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Belmont Dairy Co. v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- GMS Management Co. v. AxeCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1982
- Neo-Tech Systems, Inc. v. Provident Bank, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1974
- Columbia Real Estate Title Insurance v. Columbia Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Masternick v. Garrett, Unpublished Decision (12-10-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999