Werckmeister v. American Lithographic Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, District Judge.
This suit is brought to restrain the infringement of a copyright. Emil Werckmeister, the complainant, is an art dealer, doing business in Berlin, Germany, under the style of “Photographische Gesellschaft,” and in New York under the style of the “Berlin Photographic Company.” W. Dendy Sadler, a British subject, is an artist, who, prior to April 2, 1894, painted a picture named “Chorus,” representing a convivial group of gentlemen gathered about a punch bowl, holding pipes and filled glasses in their hands, and singing in chorus. In January, 1894, Mr. Werckmeister called…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Palmer v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Stevens v. GladdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Werckmeister v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Stephens v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Bartlett v. CrittendenUnited States Circuit Court · 1849
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Basevi v. Edward O'Toole Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Clay County Abstract Co. v. McKaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Local Trademarks, Inc. v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- American Tobacco Co. v. WerckmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.