Legal Opinion
Clay County Abstract Co. v. McKay
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 30, 1933No. 7 Div. 113PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Action by the appellant against the appellee resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant.
The case was submitted to the jury on counts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the complaint, and the plea of the general issue.
The first count is in trespass for the wrongful taking of personal property described as follows: “A copy or the copying of the abstract books or and records, and or papers of” the plaintiff. (Italics supplied.)
Counts 2, 3, and 4 are counts in trover, substantially in the form prescribed by the statute (Code 1923, § 9531, form 26).
The second count describes the property…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hussey v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Shriner v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Cronin v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Boswell v. Paramount Television Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Local Trademarks, Inc. v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Davis Hotel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935
- Jones v. DCH Health Care AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Minor v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.