Legal Opinion

State v. Gowdy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2000No. 1998-2301PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 387.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. GOWDY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Gowdy,

2000-Ohio-355.] Criminal procedure—Notice requirement for sexual offender classification hearings under R.C. 2950.09(B)(1) is mandatory. The notice requirement for sexual offender classification hearings under R.C. 2950.09(B)(1) is mandatory. (No. 98-2301—Submitted November 30, 1999—Decided April 28, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970359. __________________ {¶ 1} Huey L. Gowdy, defendant-appellant, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. TibbsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. Carver, 21328 (9-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. Burks, 07ap-553 (5-22-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. Herron, Unpublished Decision (2-20-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. DrummondsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API