Poore v. Main St. Am. Assurance Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
James P. Jones, United States District Judge
In this action under Virginia law, the plaintiffs seek recovery under a homeowners insurance policy due to mold that occurred because of water infiltration into their house over time from a leaky gutter. The insurance company denies coverage on the ground, among others, that the policy does not insure for loss caused by mold. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment, which have been fully briefed and orally argued and are ripe for decision. For the reasons stated, I find that there is no coverage under the policy.
I
The following…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- TRAVCO Insurance v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- City of Chesapeake v. STATES SELF-INSURERSSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Elegant Massage, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020