Kuhn v. Dickey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendant to recover a judgment for damages alleged to have occurred by reason of false representations alleged to have been made by the defendant in the sale of a restaurant. The defendant interposed an answer and cross-complaint and asked a judgment for the balance due on two promissory notes evidencing the unpaid balance on the purchase. The trial court awarded the cross-complainant a judgment as prayed for and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The first point made by the appellants is a contention to the effect that many of the allegations…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Dickey v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Lewis Publishing Co. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Dickey v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Sam P. McCullough, Inc. v. DoggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Tipton v. TiptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933