Legal Opinion

In re Vertex Hosiery Mills, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 1, 1930No. 2525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patients, sustaining the decision of the examiner of trade-mark interferences, which held that appellant was not entitled to the registration of a trade-mark which is described as follows:

The mark is applied or affixed to the goods by knitting onto the outer surface thereof a ridge composed of a few, immediately successive, accumulated courses of knitted loops of the self-color of the hosiery, completely encircling the same upon the outer surface thereof, a short distance below the welt, regardless 'of any run-stop characteristic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1886
  2. Daniel v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  3. Smith v. KrauseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
  4. Mann v. AppelU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1971
  3. Sparklets Corporation v. Walter Kidde Sales Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API