Legal Opinion
Sparklets Corporation v. Walter Kidde Sales Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 19, 1939No. Patent Appeals 4162, 4164PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Presiding Judge.
We are here called upon to review the decision of the Commissioner of Patents refusing the application of Sparklets Corporation for registration for use on bulbs or capsules designed to contain compressed or liquefied gas, of a mark, claimed to be a trade-mark, described in the application as consisting “of a groove or depressed band located about midway of the length of the bulb but slightly nearer to its neck than to its round base, and * * * applied or affixed to the goods by spinning or pressing the same into the bulbs or capsules.”
A pictorial representation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coschocton Glove Co. v. Buckeye Glove Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Frankfort Distilleries, Inc. v. Dextora Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- In re CampbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- In re National Stone-Tile Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In Re Dennison Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Dura Electric Lamp Company, Inc., and Michael PortnowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Burmel Handkerchief Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.