Legal Opinion

Millis Transfer, Inc. v. Z & Z Distributing Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1991No. L-91-068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Presiding Judge.

This case is on appeal from the January 20, 1991 judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court, which denied the motion of appellant, Millis Transfer, Inc., for attorney fees as a Civ.R. 11 sanction. On appeal, appellant asserts the following assignments of error:

“A. The trial court erred in denying plaintiff-appellant Millis Transfer, Inc.’s motion for sanctions against Z & Z Distributing Company on the basis that it acted in bad faith in pursuing a cause of action without any lawful basis.
“B. The trial court erred in denying plaintiff-appellant Millis Transfer, Inc.’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Fant v. SykesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Newman v. Al Castrucci Ford Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuline v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Wilkins v. Sha'ste Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Tanio v. Ultimate WashOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Wiltz v. Moundbuilders Guidance Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. New Dimensions, Inc. v. Bixler, Unpublished Decision (2-11-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API