Mohamed Ali and Nadia Ali v. A & G Company, Inc. And Saadi Ibrahim
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentOakes, Circuit Judge
I dissent.
As the majority opinion persuasively demonstrates, the trial judge in this case had the ultimate discretionary authority to dismiss for lack of prosecution and, perhaps, the factual predicate for exercising that authority, had lesser sanctions been considered and rejected with cause. I believe, however, that dismissal of an otherwise meritorious cause of action for the misconduct of counsel is rarely, if ever, an appropriate remedy in cases of this kind. Rather, the trial court should first consider the more specific and perhaps even more deterrent remedy of imposing costs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shapiro v. FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- John Gamble v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Jarka Corp. Of Philadelphia. Appeal of Timothy J. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Antoinette Bardin and John Bardin v. Philip MondonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Austin Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. PicturesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.