Legal Opinion

Austin Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 16, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order dismissing this action with prejudice for willful failure of the plaintiff to serve answers to interrogatories and for such other and further relief as to the Court may seem just and proper.

It appears that on November 16, 1956, the attorneys for the respective parties entered into a stipulation that certain of defendants’ interrogatories, which were dated April 18, 1956, should be answered by the plaintiff. Thereafter the plaintiff failed to serve answers to the interrogatories and a motion came on before this Court to dismiss the action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maresco v. LambertDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Quillie B. Woodham v. The American Cystoscope Company of Pelham, N. Y., and the Xyz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. J. M. Cleminshaw Co. v. City of NorwichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
  3. Peoples-Home Life Ins. Co. v. HaakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. McFarland v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Unique Concepts, Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API