Legal Opinion

Antoinette Bardin and John Bardin v. Philip Mondon

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 26, 1961No. 99, Docket 27009PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether Judge Dawson abused his discretion in dismissing under Rule 41(b), Fed.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C., with prejudice, an action brought by Antoinette and John Bardin against Philip Mondon to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained through the latter’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle. The dismissal resulted from the refusal of Bardin’s counsel to proceed with trial as directed by the Court below.

Under all the circumstances of this case we conclude that Judge Dawson did not abuse his discretion in ordering the dismissal; but,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ruby Joseph v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Levine v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Herbert E. Theilmann, Administrator of Herbert K. Theilmann v. The Rutland Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Donald D. DingmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Richard Chira v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Lester Jackson v. The Washington Monthly Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  4. Raymond MOORE, Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS MUSIC SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Edward Davis v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API