Legal Opinion
United States v. Neill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 24, 1996No. Crim. Action 95-0323 (JHG)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Presently pending are the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts Two Through Five of the Indictment as Barred by the Statute of Limitations and Defendant James P. Neill’s Motion to Dismiss Counts Two and Four of the Indictment as Barred by the Statute of Limitations (“Statute of Limitations Motions”). For the reasons explained below, the Statute of Limitations Motions will be granted in part and denied in part.
Background
The defendants were corporate officers and directors of Defense Marketing Services, Inc., (“DMS”), a U.S.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. George G. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen William BISCHEL, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael C. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Meir RoshkoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. KozenyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. NeillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- United States v. KozenyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.