Legal Opinion
Sikorsky International Operations, Inc. v. Babcock Mission Critical Services Limited
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 2026No. 3:19-cv-00833Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SIKORSKY INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, No. 3:19-cv-833 (OAW) v. BABCOCK MISSION CRITICAL SERVICES LIMITED, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW THIS ACTION arises from a contractual dispute between Plaintiff / Counterclaim- Defendant Sikorsky International Operations, Inc. (“Sikorsky”) and Defendant / Counterclaim-Plaintiff Babcock Mission Critical Services Limited (“Babcock”). The court has reviewed the complete record, including all evidence adduced at a bench trial…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Nobs Chemical, U.S.A., Inc. And Calmon-Hill Trading Corp., Cross-Appellees v. Koppers Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant, Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Preston v. KeithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Geysen v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.