McNabb v. Hardeman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Since the verdict was directed for the defendant, the evidence must be construed in its light most favorable to the plaintiff, in order to determine if there is any to support a verdict for him.
The contract sued upon describes the property of the defendant that was to be sold by the plaintiff as follows: “All that tract of land in Fulton County, Georgia, being improved property consisting of a house and other buildings located on a lot on the north side of Allen Road, approximately 1000 feet west from Roswell Road. Size of lot approximately 100' x 565'.”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Howard v. Sills & PurvisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Waring v. John J. Thompson & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montgomery v. Pacific & Southern Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Jenkins v. Gulf States Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Birchmore v. UpchurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Mitchell & Pickering v. Louis Isaacson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Harper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.